(PHP 4, PHP 5, PHP 7)
switch 语句类似于具有同一个表达式的一系列 if 语句。很多场合下需要把同一个变量（或表达式）与很多不同的值比较，并根据它等于哪个值来执行不同的代码。这正是 switch 语句的用途。
Note: 注意和其它语言不同，continue 语句作用到 switch 上的作用类似于 break。如果在循环中有一个 switch 并希望 continue 到外层循环中的下一轮循环，用 continue 2。
Note:
注意 switch/case 作的是松散比较。
下面两个例子使用两种不同方法实现同样的事，一个用一系列的 if 和 elseif 语句，另一个用 switch 语句：
Example #1 switch 结构
<?php
if ($i == 0) {
echo "i equals 0";
} elseif ($i == 1) {
echo "i equals 1";
} elseif ($i == 2) {
echo "i equals 2";
}
switch ($i) {
case 0:
echo "i equals 0";
break;
case 1:
echo "i equals 1";
break;
case 2:
echo "i equals 2";
break;
}
?>
Example #2 switch 结构可以用字符串
<?php
switch ($i) {
case "apple":
echo "i is apple";
break;
case "bar":
echo "i is bar";
break;
case "cake":
echo "i is cake";
break;
}
?>
为避免错误，理解 switch 是怎样执行的非常重要。switch 语句一行接一行地执行（实际上是语句接语句）。开始时没有代码被执行。仅当一个 case 语句中的值和 switch 表达式的值匹配时 PHP 才开始执行语句，直到 switch 的程序段结束或者遇到第一个 break 语句为止。如果不在 case 的语句段最后写上 break 的话，PHP 将继续执行下一个 case 中的语句段。例如：
<?php
switch ($i) {
case 0:
echo "i equals 0";
case 1:
echo "i equals 1";
case 2:
echo "i equals 2";
}
?>
这里如果 $i 等于 0，PHP 将执行所有的 echo 语句！如果 $i 等于 1，PHP 将执行后面两条 echo 语句。只有当 $i 等于 2 时，才会得到"预期"的结果——只显示"i equals 2"。所以，别忘了 break 语句就很重要（即使在某些情况下故意想避免提供它们时）。
在 switch 语句中条件只求值一次并用来和每个 case 语句比较。在 elseif 语句中条件会再次求值。如果条件比一个简单的比较要复杂得多或者在一个很多次的循环中，那么用 switch 语句可能会快一些。
在一个 case 中的语句也可以为空，这样只不过将控制转移到了下一个 case 中的语句。
<?php
switch ($i) {
case 0:
case 1:
case 2:
echo "i is less than 3 but not negative";
break;
case 3:
echo "i is 3";
}
?>
一个 case 的特例是 default。它匹配了任何和其它 case 都不匹配的情况。例如：
<?php
switch ($i) {
case 0:
echo "i equals 0";
break;
case 1:
echo "i equals 1";
break;
case 2:
echo "i equals 2";
break;
default:
echo "i is not equal to 0, 1 or 2";
}
?>
case 表达式可以是任何求值为简单类型的表达式，即整型或浮点数以及字符串。不能用数组或对象，除非它们被解除引用成为简单类型。
switch 支持替代语法的流程控制。更多信息见流程控制的替代语法一节。
<?php
switch ($i):
case 0:
echo "i equals 0";
break;
case 1:
echo "i equals 1";
break;
case 2:
echo "i equals 2";
break;
default:
echo "i is not equal to 0, 1 or 2";
endswitch;
?>
允许使用分号代替 case 语句后的冒号，例如：
<?php
switch($beer)
{
case 'tuborg';
case 'carlsberg';
case 'heineken';
echo 'Good choice';
break;
default;
echo 'Please make a new selection...';
break;
}
?>
As the doc states, switch uses loose comparison by default. We use the inversion trick (mentioned by many posters) to make it perform a strict one:
$a = 0;
switch (true) {
case ($a === true):
echo '$a is true';
break;
case ($a === false):
echo '$a is false';
break;
case ($a === 0):
echo '$a is 0';
break;
}
// outputs correctly '$a is 0';
A note on continue, continue 2, and break:
$a = [1, 2, 3];
foreach($a as $b) {
switch($b) {
case 1:
echo 'a'; continue;
case 2:
echo 'b'; continue;
default:
echo 'c'; continue;
}
echo '0';
}
// outputs a0b0c0 (and warns twice about continue in a switch statement)
foreach($a as $b) {
switch($b) {
case 1:
echo 'a'; break;
case 2:
echo 'b'; break;
default:
echo 'c'; break;
}
echo '0';
}
// outputs a0b0c0
foreach($a as $b) {
switch($b) {
case 1:
echo 'a'; continue 2;
case 2:
echo 'b'; continue 2;
default:
echo 'c'; continue 2;
}
echo '0';
}
//outputs abc0
In short, continue and break will more or less behave the same (albeit the former throws out warnings), but continue 2 will end the loop iteration, and move to the next iteration (even if there is a block in the iteration after the switch statement).
Some tests:
switch ('aaaaa') {
default : echo "DEFAULT TOP 1"; break;
default : echo "DEFAULT TOP 2"; break;
case 'aaaaa': echo "CASE TOP 1"; break;
case 'aaaaa': echo "CASE TOP 2"; break;
default : echo "DEFAULT BOTTOM 1"; break;
default : echo "DEFAULT BOTTOM 2"; break;
case 'aaaaa': echo "CASE BOTTOM 1"; break;
case 'aaaaa': echo "CASE BOTTOM 2"; break;
}
//return ------> CASE TOP 1
switch ('SOMETHING_THAT_DOESN_T_EXIST') {
default : echo "DEFAULT TOP 1"; break;
default : echo "DEFAULT TOP 2"; break;
case 'aaaaa': echo "CASE TOP 1"; break;
case 'aaaaa': echo "CASE TOP 2"; break;
default : echo "DEFAULT BOTTOM 1"; break;
default : echo "DEFAULT BOTTOM 2"; break;
case 'aaaaa': echo "CASE BOTTOM 1"; break;
case 'aaaaa': echo "CASE BOTTOM 2"; break;
}
//return ------> DEFAULT BOTTOM 2
Some observations:
- no errors if several identical boxes or defaultes
- the last defect takes over
- the first of the boxes takes the hand
- we can put the default at the top (indeed sometimes it's more intuitive)
php 7.2.8.
The answer to the eternal question " what is faster?":
1 000 000 000 iterations.
<?php
$s = time();
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000000; ++$i) {
$x = $i%10;
if ($x == 1) {
$y = $x * 1;
} elseif ($x == 2) {
$y = $x * 2;
} elseif ($x == 3) {
$y = $x * 3;
} elseif ($x == 4) {
$y = $x * 4;
} elseif ($x == 5) {
$y = $x * 5;
} elseif ($x == 6) {
$y = $x * 6;
} elseif ($x == 7) {
$y = $x * 7;
} elseif ($x == 8) {
$y = $x * 8;
} elseif ($x == 9) {
$y = $x * 9;
} else {
$y = $x * 10;
}
}
print("if: ".(time() - $s)."sec\n");
$s = time();
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000000; ++$i) {
$x = $i%10;
switch ($x) {
case 1:
$y = $x * 1;
break;
case 2:
$y = $x * 2;
break;
case 3:
$y = $x * 3;
break;
case 4:
$y = $x * 4;
break;
case 5:
$y = $x * 5;
break;
case 6:
$y = $x * 6;
break;
case 7:
$y = $x * 7;
break;
case 8:
$y = $x * 8;
break;
case 9:
$y = $x * 9;
break;
default:
$y = $x * 10;
}
}
print("switch: ".(time() - $s)."sec\n");
?>
Results:
if: 69sec
switch: 42sec
Please note that PHP won't throw any error/warning if your `switch` utilizes more than one `default` - in such case it will just jump to the first one.
Also note that you (for unknown reason for me) are allowed to use semicolons `;` along colon `:` for `case` and `default` entries:
<?php
switch($foo) {
case 0: // colon
...
break;
case 1; // semicolon is fine
...
break;
}
If you want to avoid numeric compare for numeric strings in switch statement, try prepending something non-numeric.
e.g.
<?php
$val='2';
switch($val){
case '2.0' : echo '2.0!??'; break;
case '2' : echo '2.'; break;
}
?>
echoes '2.0!??' ; while prepended version
<?php
$val='2';
switch('#' . $val){
case '#2.0' : echo '2.0!??'; break;
case '#2' : echo '2.'; break;
}
?>
echoes '2.'.
Be careful if you have mixed types of values in the switch statement. Explicitly cast your variables where possible to avoid mismatch:
<?php
$var = 0;
// This match case #1
// switch ( $var )
// This works as expected
switch ( (string)$var )
{
case "0string":
echo "0string match";
break;
}
?>
This is listed in the documentation above, but it's a bit tucked away between the paragraphs. The difference between a series of if statements and the switch statement is that the expression you're comparing with, is evaluated only once in a switch statement. I think this fact needs a little bit more attention, so here's an example:
<?php
$a = 0;
if(++$a == 3) echo 3;
elseif(++$a == 2) echo 2;
elseif(++$a == 1) echo 1;
else echo "No match!";
// Outputs: 2
$a = 0;
switch(++$a) {
case 3: echo 3; break;
case 2: echo 2; break;
case 1: echo 1; break;
default: echo "No match!"; break;
}
// Outputs: 1
?>
It is therefore perfectly safe to do:
<?php
switch(winNobelPrizeStartingFromBirth()) {
case "peace": echo "You won the Nobel Peace Prize!"; break;
case "physics": echo "You won the Nobel Prize in Physics!"; break;
case "chemistry": echo "You won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry!"; break;
case "medicine": echo "You won the Nobel Prize in Medicine!"; break;
case "literature": echo "You won the Nobel Prize in Literature!"; break;
default: echo "You bought a rusty iron medal from a shady guy who insists it's a Nobel Prize..."; break;
}
?>
without having to worry about the function being re-evaluated for every case. There's no need to preemptively save the result in a variable either.
Switch usage for make some actions with all of cases
<?php
$out = ' ';
for ($i=1;$i<10:$i++) {
switch ($i) {
case true: $out .= 'test_';
case 1:
case 2:
case 3: $out .= $i;
default: $out .= ' ';
}
}
echo $out;
?>
That sample out:
" test_1 test_2 test_3 "
Regarding [php_net at mcdragonsoftware dot com 17-Jun-2011 09:53]; the elegant function and syntax provided for an "inline switch" statement is more readable and about 25% faster than this alternative (that uses existing builtin functions), which produces the same result:
<?php echo array_pop(array_slice(array( 'rock', 'paper', 'scissors' ), --$roll, 1)); ?>
Rewriting the function (to be three times faster) provided by [stever at ashomecare dot com 07-Sep-2007 09:11] and demonstrating points that others have made:
<?php
function getChineseZodiac($year){
switch ($year % 12) :
case 0: return 'Monkey'; // Years 0, 12, 1200, 2004...
case 1: return 'Rooster';
case 2: return 'Dog';
case 3: return 'Boar';
case 4: return 'Rat';
case 5: return 'Ox';
case 6: return 'Tiger';
case 7: return 'Rabit';
case 8: return 'Dragon';
case 9: return 'Snake';
case 10: return 'Horse';
case 11: return 'Lamb';
endswitch;
}
echo getChineseZodiac(2016);
?>
It's easy to abuse the switch syntax to do some very useful things. As this example will show, the possibilities can go beyond even Duff's Device-style craziness (not that this example is nearly as clever as Duff's Device, but it demonstrates how you can do certain things other than simply the increment/decrement/assignment that's possible in C).
Fundamentally, this works mostly due to the fact that, from the point of view of the assembler/interpreter, a switch block is hardly any different from a bunch of GOTO labels and if() evaluations. But, like an if() evaluation, the line of a case: statement is evaluated as an expression. So, in this case, we can perform an assignment and match the result of that assignment, because the return value of an assignment is the data that was assigned (and not the value of the variable it was assigned to, as you might expect).
So far, this is not actually amazing, even if it is a bit unintuitive. From a language point-of-view, it would be the same as an if($var = "string") statement which is using an assignment (=) rather than a comparison (==) operator. When you look at the pre-processing optimization, because a normal assignment of $var = "string" will always equal "string", it makes sense to have the result of that expression simply be equal to the right side of the expression (the right side is used rather than the left to let the assembler/interpreter work faster, on account of how they traditionally simply change the memory location for the assigned variable rather than copy the memory around unnecessarily).
Where this becomes more interesting is where, in PHP, you have language constructs that behave like functions but are used like statements. An $array[] = "string" expression is actually a language construct that just happens to behave a lot like a function, but you use it in the same way that you use an assignment expression, and like an expression, it always evaluates to the right side of the expression; in this case, "string" and not array() .
The assembler/interpreter can't use the right side of the expression as a shortcut for the result of a function, so you can't use functions in this way in a case statement. You also can't get around this limit on calling functions from the case line by using variable functions, because they are used in the same way as functions.
But imagine what you could do with other language constructs, like eval() or include() !
Consider the following:
<?php
function flavor($type = null)
{
switch ($type) {
/* Note the isolation of break; statements and the fact that default: is at the top */
default:
$type = null;
case $array[] = "chocolate":
if ($type != null) {
$array = array($type);
break;
}
case $array[] = "strawberry":
if ($type != null) {
$array = array($type);
break;
}
case $array[] = "vanilla":
if ($type != null) {
$array = array($type);
break;
}
}
if ( (count($array) != 1) ) {
return "Flavors available: " . implode(", ", $array);
} else {
return "Flavor selected: " . implode(", ", $array);
}
}
echo flavor() . "<br>";
/* Flavors available: chocolate, strawberry, vanilla */
echo flavor("banana") . "<br>";
/* Flavors available: chocolate, strawberry, vanilla */
echo flavor("chocolate") . "<br>";
/* Flavor selected: chocolate */
?>
What makes this example useful is that you don't need a variable somewhere that contains the available options (even within the function itself), so to support new options, you only ever have to change the code to add the new option - you don't need to update some variable somewhere that controls whether or not it works or whether or not people can tell that there's a new option.
"loose comparison" means that switch won't check the type.
switch will only compare values:
<?php
if('a string' == 0) echo 'a string is 0' . PHP_EOL;
if('a string' === 0) echo 'but you will never see this' . PHP_EOL;
switch(0){
case 'a string': echo 'a string' . PHP_EOL;
case 'another string': echo 'another string' . PHP_EOL;
}
if('a string' == true) echo 'a string is TRUE' . PHP_EOL;
if('a string' === true) echo 'but you will never see this' . PHP_EOL;
switch(true){
case 'a string': echo 'a string' . PHP_EOL;
case 'another string': echo 'another string' . PHP_EOL;
}
?>
will output:
a string is 0
a string
another string
a string is TRUE
a string
another string
Something fairly simple (and maybe obvious) that I didn't see mentioned is that the default case WILL be executed even if the switched variable does not exist or is undefined.
For example:
<?php
$a = "abc";
$b = "def";
switch($c){
case "a":
echo "a";
break;
case "b":
echo "b";
break;
default:
echo "default";
break;
}
?>
Will output: default
Even though $c was never declared or defined, the default case will still be executed rather than PHP throwing an error.
Not sure if this has been posted or not, but I found the switch statement useful for finding ranges of data.
This script creates web 2.0 style links in different font sizes (popular on blogs) using a randomizer and switch statement. I used links from within a database for a mod I made for a Simple Machines forums, but this example uses arrays for links if you wanted to add your own custom links:
<?php
// Create set of links
$link = array();
$link[] = '<a href="whatever.html">page 1</a>';
$link[] = '<a href="whatever.html">page 2</a>';
$link[] = '<a href="whatever.html">page 3</a>';
$link[] = '<a href="whatever.html">page 4</a>';
$link[] = '<a href="whatever.html">page 5</a>';
$link[] = '<a href="whatever.html">page 6</a>';
$link[] = '<a href="whatever.html">page 7</a>';
$link[] = '<a href="whatever.html">page 8</a>';
// Create loop to display links
for($i = 0; $i < count($link); ++$i)
{
// Create randomizer
// Use switch statement to find font size
$randomizer = rand(1,50);
switch($randomizer)
{
case ($randomizer <= 20):
$font_size = "11";
break;
case ($randomizer <= 30):
$font_size = "16";
break;
case ($randomizer <= 40):
$font_size = "18";
break;
case ($randomizer <= 50):
$font_size = "20";
break;
}
// Display the link
echo '<span style="font-size: ' .$font_size. ';">' .$link[$i]. '</span> ';
// Loop the next link
}
?>
Using this type of range randomizer is useful for game development and it can be useful on the web too, for things where you don't want to use a randomizer just for things like (1-5) where you wanted a more then likely result for one thing over another. The switch statement saves from writing spaghetti code if statements.
Example of default NOT included as the last item
<?php
switch(5) {
case 1:
echo "1";
break;
case 2:
default:
echo "2, default";
break;
case 3;
echo "3";
break;
}
?>
Outputs '2,default'
very useful if you want your cases to be presented in a logical order in the code (as in, not saying case 1, case 3, case 2/default) and your cases are very long so you do not want to repeat the entire case code at the bottom for the default
Hamy
As follow-up to ben dot lancaster at holler dot co dot uk's post:
'continue' ends the switch, not the case, just as it would with any other flow control. Think of it as putting the execution pointer right before the ending accolade (that is, the }) because that is essentially what happens. In the case of a for loop, this would cause the iteration clause to execute, and if applicable, the loop to begin again. However, switches do not loop, which is why (as noted above, in the manual!) a continue statement essentially acts as a break when within a switch.
Just a word of warning about using switch don't try and compare variables that contain numbers with strings like so:
<?php
$i=0;
switch($i)
{
case 'TEST': print "Test";break;
case 0: print "0";break;
}
?>
The output will be: Test and not 0.
<?php
/* script 1 */
$foo = "not a number";
switch(false)
{
case "1": { $foo = "1"; break; }
case "2": { $foo = "2"; break; }
default: { $foo = "0"; }
}
echo $foo; // will produce "not a number"
/* script 2 */
$foo = "not a number";
$arr = array("not a number"); // 1 element only !
switch($arr[1]) // element $foo[1] doesn't defined
{
case "1": { $foo = "1"; break; }
case "2": { $foo = "2"; break; }
default: { $foo = "0"; }
}
echo $foo; // will produce "not a number" ( not 0 ! )
/* script 3 */
$foo = "not a number";
$arr = array("not a number"); // 1 element only !
switch($arr[1]?$arr[1]:"1") // element $foo[1] doesn't defined
{
case "1": { $foo = "1"; break; }
case "2": { $foo = "2"; break; }
default: { $foo = "0"; }
}
echo $foo;
// will produce :
// 1 if $arr[1] isn't set
// 1 if $arr[1]=1
// 2 if $arr[1]=2
// 0 if none of above
?>
Haven't seen it mentioned here, but at least in my version (PHP 5.2.5) and I'm sure all of PHP 5, the switch statement is a great way to check type safe enumerates that are otherwise missing in the PHP language. Example:
<?php
class WannabeEnum {
/**
* @var WannabeEnum
*/
public static $FOO;
/**
* @var WannabeEnum
*/
public static $BAR;
/**
* @var WannabeEnum
*/
public static $FOOBAR;
private $_ordinal;
public function __construct($ordinal) {
$this->_ordinal = $ordinal;
}
}
WannabeEnum::$FOO = new WannabeEnum(1);
WannabeEnum::$BAR = new WannabeEnum(2);
WannabeEnum::$FOOBAR = new WannabeEnum(3);
function testSwitch(WannabeEnum $wannabeEnum) {
switch($wannabeEnum) {
case WannabeEnum::$FOO:
echo('Foo!' . PHP_EOL);
break;
case WannabeEnum::$BAR:
echo('Bar!' . PHP_EOL);
break;
default:
echo('Default!' . PHP_EOL);
}
}
testSwitch(WannabeEnum::$FOO);
testSwitch(WannabeEnum::$FOOBAR);
?>
Outputs:
Foo!
Default!
Don't forget it uses loose comparisons!
In reply to lko at netuse dot de
Just so others know whom may not, that's because PHP does automatic type conversion if a string is evaluated as an integer (it sees the 2 in '2string' so when compared like if ('2string' == 2), PHP sees if (2 == 2) ).
I just tested it, but if you go:
<?php
$string="2string";
switch($string)
{
case (string) 1:
echo "this is 1";
break;
case (string) 2:
echo "this is 2";
break;
case '2string':
echo "this is a string";
break;
}
?>
The output will be "this is a string" and if you change $string to "2" it will again be "this is 2".
Just in case that may help anyone who may run into that problem.
Attention if you have mixed types of value in one switch statemet it can make you some trouble
<?php
$string="2string";
switch($string)
{
case 1:
echo "this is 1";
break;
case 2:
echo "this is 2";
break;
case '2string':
echo "this is a string";
break;
}
?>
The swich-statement will halt on 'case 2'
Answer: this is 2
Something not mentioned in the documentation itself, and only touched on momentarily in these notes, is that the default: case need not be the last clause in the switch.
<?php
for($i=0; $i<8; ++$i)
{
echo $i,"\t";
switch($i)
{
case 1: echo "One"; break;
case 2:
default: echo "Thingy"; break;
case 3:
case 4: echo "Three or Four"; break;
case 5: echo "Five"; break;
}
echo "\n";
}
?>
Outputs what you'd expect, namely
0 Thingy
1 One
2 Thingy
3 Three or Four
4 Three or Four
5 Five
6 Thingy
7 Thingy
with case 2 and the default both producing the same result ("Thingy"); strictly speaking, the case 2 clause is completely empty and control just falls straight through. The same result could have been achieved with
<?php
switch($i)
{
case 1: echo "One"; break;
case 3:
case 4: echo "Three or Four"; break;
case 5: echo "Five"; break;
default: echo "Thingy"; break;
}
?>
But if "case 2" represented a fairly common case (other than "everything else"), then it would be better to declare it explicitly, not only because it saves time by not having to test EVERY other case first (in the current example, PHP finds 'case 2' in the first switch in two tests, but in the second switch it has to make four tests before giving up and going with the default) but also because someone (perhaps yourself in a few months' time) will be reading the code and expecting to see it handled. Listing it explicitly aids comprehension
In reply to earlier comment, "switch"- I found this to be one of the best ways to interpret 'actions'. Simply create a new instance of Handler_action before including any content source files. This is a highly stripped version of the class.
The real one I created handles (and secures) input for $_GET and $_POST, creates a 'permission' array that only allows certain actions to be called by non-admins, and creates handy little diagnostic messages that can be displayed upon redirecting.
On that note, the beauty in this class really shines in the simple redirect. You wont be left with ugly URLs like, "http://www.domain.com/path/to/script.php?action=blah&var1=123". Rather, you will be left with something like "http://www.domain.com/path/to/script.php"- helps protect some of the site by not showing any vulnerabilities in URLs.
Also, this class keeps all actions organized neatly by directly passing $_GET vars to the actions through function parameters.
<?php
class Handler_action {
function __construct( ){
//Add code here to secure attacks through $_GET or use $_POST
$action = $_GET["action"];
//$actions_index conventions:
//'action_name' => array( 'arg1', 'arg2', 'etc', ['/redirect/to/path' | NULL ] )
$actions_index = array(
'create' => array( $_GET['newVar1'], $_GET['newVar2'], '/home.php' ),
'edit' => array( $_GET['id'], $_GET['otherVar'], '/home.php' ),
'delete' => array( $_GET['id'], '/other_script.php' )
);
if( $action && array_key_exists( $action, $actions_index ) ){
$redirect_path = array_pop( $actions_index[$action] );
call_user_func_array( array( &$this, $action ), $actions_index[$action] );
if( $redirect_path )
header( "Location: http://www.domain.com{$redirect_path}" );
}
}
//being defining actions now
function create( $new_var1, $new_var2 ){
//code...
}
function edit( $id, $other_var ){
//code...
}
function delete( $id ){
//code...
}
}
?>
I could have used a swich for this, but I found that using the array was much faster.
$action = $_GET['action'];
$pages = array
(
'edit' => './edit.php',
'search' => './search.php'
);
if(strlen($pages[$action]) > 0)
{
require $pages[$action];
}
else
{
require './default.php';
}
Be careful if distinguishing between NULL and (int)0. As implied in the above documentation, the case statements are equivalent to the '==' operator, not the '===' operator, so the following code did not work as i expected:
<?php
$mixed = 0;
switch($mixed){
case NULL: echo "NULL"; break;
case 0: echo "zero"; break;
default: echo "other"; break;
}
?>
Instead, I may use a chain of else-ifs. (On this page, kriek at jonkreik dot com states that "in most cases [a switch statement] is 15% faster [than an else-if chain]" but jemore at m6net dotdot fr claims that when using ===, if/elseif/elseif can be 2 times faster than a switch().)
Alternatively, if i prefer the appearance of the switch() statement I may use a trick like the one nospam at please dot com presents:
<?php
$mixed = 0;
switch(TRUE){
case (NULL===$mixed): //blah break;
case (0 ===$mixed): //etc. break;
}
?>
code till dawn! mark meves!
Declaring a variable (actually an array) as static w/in a switch{} spun my wool for a while:
don't:
<?
function ss() {
switch ("bug") {
case "bug" :
static $test = "xyz";
break;
default :
static $test = "abc";
}
echo $test;
}
ss(); //abc
?>
do:
<?
function tt() {
static $test;
switch ("fix") {
case "fix" :
$test = "xyz";
break;
default :
$test = "abc";
}
echo $test;
}
tt(); // xyz
?>
Did you know that switch() and case() can also accomodate things like basic math calculations and counter incrementing? They do. In this example, I use a switch statement (which is inside of a while loop) to alternate the background color of a table row. It gives me a cool spool-printer-paper effect.
<?php
$rows_per_color = 5; // change bgcolor every 5 rows
switch($ctr++) {
case 0:
$bgcolor = "#ffffff";
break;
case ($rows_per_color):
$bgcolor = "#ff0000";
break;
case ($rows_per_color * 2):
$bgcolor = "#ffffff";
$ctr = 1;
break;
}
?>
As you can see, I increment $ctr by 1 in the switch() itself, and the final case() does a simple calculation. Simple, but powerful. [Remember, the above example is inside of a while() loop... each time it iterates, switch increments $ctr.]
In response to the entry by "kriek at jonkriek dot com", I think you would probably be better of doing this:
<?php
// ensure $_GET['go'] is set, an integer, and not 0
// then, set nav number; default to 1
$nav = ( isset($_GET['go']) && (intval($_GET['go']) == $_GET['go']) && $_GET['go'] ) ?
intval($_GET['go']) : 1;
// format navigation string and include
include(sprintf("Page%02d.php",$nav));
?>
... as oppposed to the switch setup you recommended, which is limited to the number of cases you specify...
Remember, that you also could use functions in a switch.
For example, if you need to use regular expressions in a switch:
<?php
$browserName = 'mozilla';
switch ($browserName) {
case 'opera':
echo 'opera';
break;
case (preg_match("/Mozilla( Firebird)?|phoenix/i", $browserName)?$browserName:!$browserName):
echo "Mozilla or Mozilla Firebird";
break;
case 'konqueror':
echo 'Konqueror';
break;
default:
echo 'Default';
break;
}
?>
or you could just use a regular expression for everything:
<?php
$uri = 'http://www.example.com';
switch (true) {
case preg_match("/$http(s)?/i", $uri, $matches):
echo $uri . ' is an http/https uri...';
break;
case preg_match("/$ftp(s)?/i", $uri, $matches):
echo $uri . ' is an ftp/ftps uri...';
break;
default:
echo 'default';
break;
}
?>
You can also nest switch statements inside case statements:
<?php
// Set argument handlers
$argv = explode(",", urldecode(getenv('QUERY_STRING')));
$argc = array_shift($argv);
$argd = array_shift($argv);
$arge = array_shift($argv);
?>
// Begin switching
<?php
switch ($argc) {
case 'home': {
print('This is $argc, home case.');
break;
}
case 'subsection': {
switch ($argd) {
case 'links': {
switch($arge) {
case 'display': {
print('This is $arge, subsection,links,display case.');
break;
}
}
}
}
}
}
?>
In answer to njones at fredesign dot com, what you're seeing is the way the switch statement is supposed to work. The switch statement evaluates the cases, top to bottom, until it finds the first one that matches the value being switch()ed on. So, for example, if you had:
<?php
switch(2) {
case 1: echo "One\n"; break;
case 2: echo "Two\n"; break;
case 3: echo "Three\n"; break;
case 2: echo "Two again\n"; break;
}
?>
Only "Two" would get echoed. "Two again" would NOT get echoed, because once the first case matches, the rest of them do NOT get evaluated. As soon as a matching case is found, the statements starting at that case get executed until the first break, then control flows out the bottom of the switch block.
working a bit around with it I found out that it is not possible to
compare the variable with two different values in one step like this
(system running a w2k server, apache2.0.43 & php430):
<?php
switch ($myvar) {
case ("foo" || "bar"): //do something
break;
case ("other"): //do another thing
break;
default:
}
?>
rather use:
<?php
switch ($myvar) {
case ("foo"):
case ("bar"): //do something
break;
case ("other"): //do another thing
break;
default:
}
?>
Be very careful when you're using text strings as cases. If the variable supplied to switch() is an integer, the cases would be converted to integer before the comparison is made (usually to zero). The following snippet prints "hello".
<?php
$a = 0;
switch($a) {
case 'Hello': echo "Hello";
break;
}
?>
In case : ) it helps someone, I was able to clean up some hairball code by using nested switches (didn't see it mentioned here). Thanks to all those who are writing examples - I love this site!
<?php
$string_match="second";
switch ($string_match) {
case "first":
case "second":
case "third":
print "<H3>Something for all three</H3><br>";
switch ($string_match) {
case "first":
print "something for first only";
break;
case "second":
case "third":
print "something for the other two";
break;
}
break;
default:
print "<H3>no match</H3>";
}
?>
often you will have to perform multiple actions in sequence, but this sequence must be broken once one of them detects a stop condition (such as an error, when validating form request variables).
One way is to use:
if (check1()
&& check2()
&& check3()
) valid();
else error();
But when the sequence is long and must reordered, this can be errorprone because not all line of check have the same syntax (imagine that you want to comment one of them).
Another way is to rewrite it as:
check1() and
check2() and
check3() and
...
valid() or
error();
The above syntax does not fit well when the valid() code must be several statements.
An alternative syntax can be:
switch (false) {
case check1():
case check2():
case check3():
error();
break;
default:
valid();
}
This last equivalent sample show you that each case expressions is evaluated, until one of them evaluates to a value equal (==) to the switch expression. Above, the error() code will only be called if one of the check evaluates to false. And the valid() code will only be evaluated only if the switch reach the default, which means that none of the above check returned false...
Just a trick I have picked up:
If you need to evaluate several variables to find the first one with an actual value, TRUE for instance. You can do it this was.
There is probably a better way but it has worked out well for me.
switch (true) {
case (X != 1):
case (Y != 1):
default:
}